Small Business Management Master Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3000 words

Sm every Business Management Master - Case Study ExampleA brief reference to the theories declared in the literature regarding the above sectors has been considered as necessary in order to understand the operational structure of the tighten and to estimate its prospects for the future.Scruffy Dog Media is base in Cumbria. The firm, in accordance with its official website is characterized as a family-owned video production company formed in 2007 to produce naughty quality video real for companies and organisations in and around the Cumbria area (firms website). As noticed above dickens particular sectors of the firm will be examined the leading and the HR management. In accordance with the firms website the firm operates under the guidance of John Gilluley and Lorna Hardy. Both of them have worked in the area for many years before deciding to form their own firm. It seems that the leadership in the firm has been distributed between these two persons who have equal obligations and rights regarding the firms administration and profits. No other staff is clearly mentioned in the firms website and it put up be assumed that these two persons do the work themselves or they possible hire staff whenever the needs of a particular throw up require additional staff. Under these terms, the analysis of the firms leadership and its HR policies would be based on the role of these two persons in the firms administration and the appropriateness of their decisions regarding the distribution of tasks in the firm. 3. lead and HRM - critical analysis3.1 LeadershipThe importance of leadership for the development of any firm around the world cannot be denied. In accordance with Day et al. (1988, 453) when several methodological concerns are addressed, it is unambiguous that executive leadership can explain as much as 45% of an organizations performance. In other words, leadership is considered to have an important role in the firms performance but it should be rather inter preted as part of the corporate activity, in combination with other characteristics of a firms operational activities (HR management, operations management, pecuniary management and so on). On the other hand, Hart et al. (1993) highlights the significance of the role of the CEO for the success of any corporate initiatives. More specifically, the above researcher supports that CEOs with high behavioral complexity - the ability to play multiple, competing roles - produce the best firm performance, particularly with respect to business performance (growth and innovation) and organizational (stakeholder) effectiveness executive leadership role had little to do with firms financial performance (Hart et al., 1993, 543). In the case of small firms, where there is no CEO the above assumptions can be used simply in order to evaluate the role of the firms director(s), i.e. of the persons that have the responsibility for the design and the completion of any firms activity. In this context, a lthough there is no CEO having the supervision of all plans and initiatives, the responsibility of the directors is not limited but it is equally distributed among them. In the particular firm there is no reference to the firms staff - apart from its directors. For this reason, only assumptions can be made regarding the HR policies applied by the firm. At a first level, it could be assumed that in any case that a project is too complex, the firms